2021

• Burt DJ, Fröb F and Ilyina T (2021) The Sensitivity of the Marine Carbonate System to Regional Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement. Front. Clim. 3:624075. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2021.624075 / https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.624075/full
• Klaus, G., Oswald, L., Ernst, A. and Merk, C. (2021) Effects of opinion statements on laypeople's acceptance of a climate engineering technology. Comparing the source credibility of researchers, politicians and a citizens' jury. doi:10.22323/2.20010203
• Robrecht, S., Vogel, B., Tilmes, S., Müller, R. Potential of future stratospheric ozone loss in the midlatitudes under global warming and sulfate geoengineering. doi:10.5194/acp-21-2427-2021 /https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/2427/2021/
• Stenzel, F., Gerten, D., Hanasaki, N. (2021): Global scenarios of irrigation water abstractions for bioenergy production: a systematic review. In Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 25 (4), pp. 1711–1726. DOI: 10.5194/hess-25-1711-2021. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1711-2021
  
• Stenzel, F., Greve, P., Lucht, W., Tramberend, S., Wada, Y. and Gerten, D.  Irrigation of biomass plantations may globally increase water stress more than climate change. Nat Commun 12, 1512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21640-3

2020

• Amann, T., Hartmann, J., Struyf, E., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Fischer, E. K., Janssens, I., Meire, P. and Schoelynck, J. (2020) Enhanced Weathering and related element fluxes – a cropland mesocosm approach. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-103-2020
• Barben, D.; Matzner, N. (2020): Anticipatory Governance of Climate Engineering. In Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Geoengineering. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.69.
• Kreuter, J., Matzner, N., Baatz, C., Keller, D.P., Markus, T., Wittstock, F., Bernitt, U. and Mengis, N. Unveiling assumptions through interdisciplinary scrutiny: Observations from the German Priority Program on Climate Engineering (SPP 1689). Climatic Change (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02777-4
• Matzner, N. and Barben, D. (2020): Climate Engineering as a Communication Challenge: Contested Notions of Responsibility Across Expert Arenas of Science and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019899408
• Neuber, F. and Ott, K. The Buying Time Argument within the Solar Radiation Management Discourse. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134637
• Ott, K. and Neuber, F. (2020) The Debate on Climate Engineering in the Con­text of Climate Change. In Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Geoengineering. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.815
• Rickels,W., Quaas, M. F., Ricke, K., Quaas, J., Moreno-Cruz, J., Smulders, S. (2020)
  Who turns the global thermostat and by how much? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104852

2019

• Boyd, P., C. Vivian, M. Boettcher, F. Chai, J. Cullen, T. Goeschl, R. Lampitt, A. Lenton, A. Oschlies, G. Rau, R. Rickaby, K. Ricke an R. Wanninkhof (2019). High Level Review of a Wide Range of Proposed Marine Geoengineering Techniques, Journal Series GESAMP Reports and Studies 98, http://www.gesamp.org/publications/high-level-review-of-a-wide-range-of-proposed-marine-geoengineering-techniques 
• Carrier, M., Lenhard, J. (2019) Climate Models: How to Assess Their Reliability, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 32:2, 81-100, DOI:10.1080/02698595.2019.1644722
• Irvine, P., K. Emanuel, J. He, L. W. Horowitz, G. Vecchi and D. Keith (2019). Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards, Nature Climate Changevolume 9, 295–299, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0398-8
• Gramelsberger, G., Lenhard, J., and Parker, W. (2019): Philosophical Perspectives on Earth System Modeling: Truth, Adequacy and Understanding, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001720
• Klaus, G., A. Ernst, L. Oswald (2019) Psychological factors influencing laypersons’ acceptance of climate engineering, climate change mitigation and business as usual scenarios. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101222
• Mengis, N., D. P. Keller, W. Rickels, M. Quaas and A. Oschlies (2019). Climate engineering–induced changes in correlations between Earth system variables—implications for appropriate indicator selection, Climate Change, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-019-02389-7 
• Merk, C., Klaus, G., Pohlers, J., Ernst, A., Ott, K., and Rehdanz, K. (2019): Public Perceptions of Climate Engineering: Laypersons’ Acceptance at Different Levels of Knowledge and Intensities of Deliberation. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.4.6
  
• Pfrommer, T., Goeschl, T., Proelss, A. et al. Climatic Change (2019). Establishing causation in climate litigation: admissibility and reliability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4
• Reith, F., W. Koeve, D. P. Keller, J. Getzlaff and A. Oschlies (2019). Meeting climate targets by direct CO2 injections: What price would the ocean have to pay? Earth System Dynamics, https://www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/esd-2018-87/
• Rickels, W., C, Merk, F. Reith, D. Keller and A. Oschlies (2019). (Mis)conceptions about modelling of negative emissions technologies. Environ. Res. Lett., https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3ab4
• Robrecht, S., B. Vogel, J.-U. Grooß, K. Rosenlof, T. Thornberry, A. Rollins, M. Krämer, L. Christensen and R. Müller (2019) Mechanism of ozone loss under enhanced water vapour conditions in the mid-latitude lower stratosphere in Summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5805-5833, https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/5805/2019/
• Stenzel, F., D. Gerten, C. Werner and J. Jägermeyr (2019) Freshwater requirements of large-scale bioenergy plantations for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, Environmental Research Letters 14, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2b4b

2018

• Beck, Silke; et al. (2018): The politics of anticipation. The IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience, https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2018.7
• Beck, Silke, M. Mahony (2018): The IPCC and the new map of science and politics, WIREs Clim Change, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.547
• Ferrer González, Miriam, Tatiana Ilyina, Sebastian Sonntag, Hauke Schmidt (2018): Enhanced Rates of Regional Warming and Ocean Acidification after Termination of Large‐scale Ocean Alkalinization, Geophysical Research Letters, doi: 10.1029/2018gl077847
• Heck, Vera; et al. (2018): Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries, Nature Climate Change (2018), doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y
• Held, Hermann (2018): Der ökonomische Wert von Klimainformation: Zur Neuinterpretation von Klimazielen unter antizipiertem Lernen, Unsicherheit als Herausforderung für die Wissenschaft, https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631761533/chapter-003.xhtml#_idParaDest-5
• Janich, Nina and C. Stumpf (2018): Verantwortung unter der Bedingung von Unsicherheit - und was KlimawissenschaftlerInnen darunter verstehen, Unsicherheit als Herausforderung für die Wissenschaft, https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631761533/chapter-009.xhtml#_idParaDest-13
• Keller, D.P., Lenton, A., Littleton, E.W. et al. (2018): The Effects of Carbon Dioxide Removal on the Carbon Cycle, Curr Clim Change Rep, 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0104-3
• Keller, D. P., Lenton, A., Scott, V., Vaughan, N. E., Bauer, N., Ji, D., Jones, C. D., Kravitz, B., Muri, H., and Zickfeld, K.: The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDR-MIP): Rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-168, 2018
• Keller D.P. (2018) Marine Climate Engineering. In: Salomon M., Markus T. (eds) Handbook on Marine Environment Protection. Springer, Cham, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60156-4_13
• Kleinschmitt, C., Boucher, O., and Platt, U. (2018): Sensitivity of the radiative forcing by stratospheric sulfur geoengineering to the amount and strategy of the SO₂injection studied with the LMDZ-S3A model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2769-2786, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2769-2018
  
• Kriegler, M., G. Luderer, N. Bauer, L. Baumstark, S. Fujimori, A. Popp, J. Rogelj, J. Strefler, . P. van Vuuren (2018): Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time?, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2018 376 20160457, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457
• Lenhard, Johannes (2018) Holism or the Erosion of Modularity – a Methodological Challenge for Validation, Philosophy of Science, 85, 832–844, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/699675
  
• Lawrence, Mark G., S. Schäfer, H. Muri, V. Scott, A. Oschlies, N. E. Vaughan, O. Bucher, H. Schmidt, J. Haywood and J. Scheffran (2018): Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals, Nature Communications 9 (3734), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3
• Matzner, Nils and D. Barben (2018): Verantwortungsvoll das Klima manipulieren? Unsicherheit und Verantwortung im Diskurs um Climate Engineering, Unsicherheit als Herausforderung für die Wissenschaft, https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631761533/chapter-008.xhtml#_idParaDest-12
• Mengis, N., Keller, D. P., and Oschlies, A. (2018): Systematic Correlation Matrix Evaluation (SCoMaE) – a bottom–up, science-led approach to identifying indicators, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 15-31, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-15-2018
• Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G. and Rehdanz, K. (2018) Do climate engineering experts display moral-hazard behaviour?, Climate Policy, DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1494534
• Neuber, Frederike (2017): Buying Time with Climate Engineering? An analysis of the buying time framing in favor of climate engineering, https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000084294
• Oliveira-Garcia, W., T. Amann, J. Hartmann (2018): Increasing biomass demand enlarges negative forest nutrient budget areas in wood export regions, Scientific Reports 8 (5280), doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22728-5
• Oschlies, Andreas (2018): Bewertung von Modellqualität und Unsicherheiten in der Klimamodellierung, Unsicherheit als Herausforderung für die Wissenschaft, https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631761533/chapter-002.xhtml#_idTextAnchor040
• Oschlies, Andreas (2018): Solar engineering must take temperature debt into account, Nature 554, 423, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02203-x
• Ott, K. K. (2018): On the Political Economy of Solar Radiation Management, Frontiers in Environmental Science 6, 43,  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00043 

• Pfrommer, T. (2018): Diverging Regional Climate Preferences and the Assessment of Solar Geoengineering, Discussion Paper Series (654), doi:10.11588/heidok.00025204

• Rickels, W., M. Quaas, K. Ricke, J. Quaas, J. Moreno-Cruz, S. Smulders (2018): Turning the Global Thermostat — Who, When, and How Much?, Kiel Working Paper (2110), https://www.ifw-kiel.de/de/experten/ifw-researcher-internal/wilfried-rickels/turning-the-global-thermostat-who-when-and-how-much/

• Rickels, W., Reith, F., Keller, D., Oschlies, A., & Quaas, M. F. (2018): Integrated Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Removal, Earth’s Future, 6. doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000724

• Roshan, E., M. M. Khabbazan & H. Held (2018): Cost-Risk Trade-Off of Mitigation and Solar Geoengineering: Considering Regional Disparities Under Probabilistic Climate Sensitivity,  Environ. Resource Econ., 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0261-9

• Sonntag, Sebastian; et al. (2018): Quantifying and comparing effects of climate engineering methods on the Earth system, Earth's Future, doi:10.1002/2017EF000620

• Strefler, Jessica; et al. (2018): Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs, Environmental Research Letters, 13. 044015. doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2ba
• Strefler, Jessica; et al. (2018): Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks
  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4
• Werner, C., H-P. Schmidt, D. Gerten, W. Lucht and C. Kammann (2018): Biogeochemical potential of biomass pyrolysis systems for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, Environmental Research Letters 13 (4), http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e

   

2017

• Beck, Silke; Mahony, Martin (2017): The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. In: Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, p. 311-333, DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3264 http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v7/n5/full/nclimate3264.html?WT.ec_id=NCLIMATE-201705&spMailingID=53950284&spUserID=ODkwMTM2NjQyMAS2&spJobID=1144733188&spReportId=MTE0NDczMzE4OAS2
• Braun, Carola; Merk, Christine; Pönitzsch, Gert; Rehdanz, Katrin; Schmidt, Ulrich (2017): Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany. Survey evidence. In: Climate Policy 5 (1), S. 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1304888 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14693062.2017.1304888?tokenDomain=eprints&tokenAccess=vqDyV6Wab5KBByafy5fX&forwardService=showFullText&doi=10.1080%2F14693062.2017.1304888&doi=10.1080%2F14693062.2017.1304888&journalCode=tcpo2
• Boucher, O., Kleinschmitt, C., & Myhre, G. (2017). Quasi‐additivity of the radiative effects of marine cloud brightening and stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 11,158–11,165.https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074647
• Boysen, Lena R.; et al. (2017): The limits to global-warming mitigation by terrestrial carbon removal. In: Earth's Future. DOI:10.1002/2016EF000469 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000469/full
• Boysen, Lena; et. al (2017): Trade-offs for food production, nature conservation and climate limit the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential. In: Global Change Biology, Accepted Articles, DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13745 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.13745/abstract
• Feng, E. Y.; Koeve, W.; Keller, D. P. and Oschlies, A. (2017): Model-based Assessment of the CO2 Sequestration Potential of Coastal Ocean Alkalinization. In Earth's Future. DOI: 10.1002/2017EF000659. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017EF000659/pdf
• Ferrer-Gonzalez, M. (2017). Climate engineering by enhancement of ocean alkalinity: impacts on the Earth system and a comparison with solar radiation management. PhD Thesis, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg. doi:10.17617/2.2472753. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-CEB7-1
• Hasse, H. and Lenhard, J. (2017): Boon and Bane. On the Role of Adjustable Parameters in Simulation Models, in: Lenhard, J. and Carrier, M. (eds.): Mathematics as a Tool. Tracing New Roles of Mathematics in the Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 327, Cham: Springer, 93-115, https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319544687#aboutBook
  
• Keller, D. P., Lenton, A., Scott, V., Vaughan, N. E., Bauer, N., Ji, D., Jones, C. D., Kravitz, B., Muri, H., and Zickfeld, K.: The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDR-MIP): Rationale and experimental design, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-168, in review, 2017.
• Kemena,Tronje Peer; Matthes, Katja; Martin, Thomas; Wahl, Sebastian; Oschlies, Andreas: Atmospheric feedbacks in North Africa from an irrigated, afforested Sahara, Clim Dyn (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3890-8
• Kleinschmitt, C. (2017): Climate Engineering with Stratospheric Sulphate Aerosol: Development and Application of a Global Atmosphere-Aerosol Model for Studying Potential Efficacy and Impacts. https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00023955
• Kleinschmitt, C., Boucher, O., Bekki, S., Lott, F., and Platt, U. (2017): The Sectional Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol module (S3A-v1) within the LMDZ general circulation model: description and evaluation against stratospheric aerosol observations, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3359-3378,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3359-2017
• Lenhard, J. and Carrier, M. (eds.) (2017): Mathematics as a Tool. Tracing New Roles of Mathematics in the Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 327. Cham: Springer. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319544687#aboutBook
• Lenhard, J., and Carrier, M. (2017). Mathematics as a Tool, in Lenhard, J. and Carrier, M. (eds.): Mathematics as a Tool. Tracing New Roles of Mathematics in the Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 327, Cham: Springer, 1-19, https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319544687#aboutBook
• Lohmann, Ulrike, Gasparini, Blaž: A cirrus cloud climate dial?, Science 21 Jul 2017, Vol. 357, Issue 6348, pp. 248-249, DOI: 10.1126/science.aan3325, http://science.sciencemag.org/content/357/6348/248
• Montserrat, Francesc; et al. (2017): Olivine Dissolution in Seawater: Implications for CO2 Sequestration through Enhanced Weathering in Coastal Environments. In: Environmental Science & Technology, 51, 3960-3970. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05942 http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.6b05942
• Muraca, Barbara; Neuber, Frederike (2017): Viable and convivial technologies: Considerations on Climate Engineering from a degrowth perspective. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.159 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617308983
• 

Neuber, Frederike (2017): Buying Time with Climate Engineering? An analysis of the buying time framing in favor of climate engineering, https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000084294
• Niemeier, U. and Schmidt, H. (2017): Changing transport processes in the stratosphere by radiative heating of sulfate aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14871-14886, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14871-2017
• Niemeier, Ulrike, Tilmes, Simone: Sulfur injections for a cooler planet, Science 21 Jul 2017, Vol. 357, Issue 6348, pp. 246-248, DOI: 10.1126/science.aan3317, http://science.sciencemag.org/content/357/6348/246
• Quaas, M. F.; Quaas, J.; Rickels, W.; Boucher, O. (2017): Are there reasons against open-ended research into solar radiation management? A model of intergenerational decision-making under uncertainty. In Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.02.002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069617300608
• Stelzer, Harald (2017): Justifying Climate Engineering?. In: Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik. Band 21 (2016). Berlin: De Gruyter, 147–169.

2016

• Boysen, Lena; et. al (2016): Impacts devalue the potential of large-scale terrestrial CO2 removal through biomass plantations. In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 11, Letter 9, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095010 http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095010/meta;jsessionid=325AACE0FC1BCA551F5ABFF7BC15679E.ip-10-40-2-108
• Baatz, Christian; Ott, Konrad (2016): Why Aggressive Mitigation Must Be Part of Any Pathway to Climate Justice. In: Christopher J. Preston (Ed.): Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Rowman & Littlefield International. http://www.rowmaninternational.com/books/climate-justice-and-geoengineering
  
• Baatz, C. (2016): Can we have it both ways? On potential trade-offs between Mitigation and Solar Radiation Management, Environmental Values 25, 1, http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2016/00000025/00000001/art00004
• Baatz, Christian; Heyward, Clare; Stelzer, Harald (2016): The Ethics of Engineering the Climate. In: Special Issue of Environmental Values, vol. 25, no. 1: The Ethics of Engineering the Climate http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2016/00000025/00000001/art00002?token=004f1a0141e466b0c46e586546243125423b4746213e662a5f2c5
• Gasparini, Blaž; Lohmann, Ulrike (2016): Why cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially cool the planet. In: J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121 (9), pp. 4877–4893. DOI 10.1002/2015JD024666. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JD024666/abstract
• Ellias Y Feng (冯玉铭), David P Keller, Wolfgang Koeve and Andreas Oschlies (2016): Could artificial ocean alkalinization protect tropical coral ecosystems from ocean acidification? In: Environmental Research Letters, vol. 11, no. 7, http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074008/meta
• Ferrer Gonzales, Miriam; Ilyina, Tatiana (2016): Impacts of artificial ocean alkalinization on the carbon cycle and climate in Earth system simulation. In: Geophysical Research Letter, Vol. 43, issue 12 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL068576/abstract
• Heck, Vera; Donges, Jonathan F.; Lucht, Wolfgang (2016): Collateral transgression of planetary boundaries due to climate engineering by terrestrial carbon dioxide removal. In: Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., pp. 1–24. DOI 10.5194/esd-2016-22. http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/7/783/2016/
• Kreidenweis, Ulrich; Humpenöder, Florian; Stevanović, Miodrag; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon; Kriegler, Elmar; Lotze-Campen, Hermann; Popp, Alexander (2016): Afforestation to mitigate climate change. Impacts on food prices under consideration of albedo effects. In: Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (8), p. 85001–85001. DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/085001 http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/085001
  
• Mengis, Nadine; et al. (2016): Assessing climate impacts and risks of ocean albedo modification in the Arctic. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, vol. 121, 3 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/2015JC011433/abstract
• Merk, Christine; Pönitzsch, Gert; Rehdanz, Katrin (2016): Knowledge about aerosol injection does not reduce individual mitigration efforts. In: Environmental Research Letters, vol. 11, no. 5 http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054009/meta
• Merk, Christine; Pönitzsch, Gert (2016): The role of affect in attitude formation toward new technologies: The case of stratospheric aerosol injection. Kiel Institute for the World Economy (Kiel Working Paper, 2024). http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/125936
• Oschlies, A.; Klepper, G. (2016): Research for assessment, not deployment of Climate Engineering: The German Research Foundation's Priority Program SPP 1689. In Earth´s Future. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000446/abstract
• Oschlies, A.; Held, H.; Keller, D.; Keller, K.; Mengis, N.; Quaas, M. et al. (2016): Indicators and Metrics for the Assessment of Climate Engineering. In Earth's Future. DOI 10.1002/2016EF000449 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000449/full
  
• Quaas, J.; Quaas, M. F.; Boucher, O. & Rickels, W. (2016): Regional climate engineering by radiation management: Prerequisites and prospects. In: Earth's future, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000440/full
• Sonntag, Sebastian; Pongratz, Julia; Reick, H. Christian; Schmidt, Hauke (2016): Reforestation in a high-CO2 world-Higher mitigation potential than expected, lower adaptation potential than hoped for. In: Geophysical Research Letter, Vol. 43, issue 11 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL068824/abstract
• Stelzer, Harald; Schuppert, Fabian (2016): How Much Risk Ought We to Take? Exploring the Possibilities of Risk-Sensitive Consequentialism in the Context of Climate Engineering. In: Special Issue of Environmental Values, vol. 25, no. 1: The Ethics of Engineering the Climate. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/search/article?option1=tka&value1=how+much+risk&pageSize=10&index=1
  

   

2015

• Aswathy, V. N., Boucher, O., Quaas, M., Niemeier, U., Muri, H., Mülmenstädt, J. and Quaas, J. (2015): Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9593-9610, DOI:10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015, http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/9593/2015/acp-15-9593-2015.html
• Baatz, C., Ott, K. (2015): In Defense of Emissions Egalitarianism? In: L. Meyer & P. Sanklecha (Eds.), Climate Justice and Historical Emissions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (forthcoming), https://www.philsem.uni-kiel.de/de/lehrstuehle/philosophie-und-ethik-der-umwelt/files/baatz_ott-emissions_egal-web.pdf
• Barben, D. (2015): Climate Engineering gegen den globalen Klimawandel? Perspektiven verantwortlicher Forschung und Governance, in: A. Bogner, M. Decker und M. Sotoudeh (Eds.): Responsible Innovation. Neue Impulse für die Technikfolgenabschätzung? Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845272825-205
• Betz, G. (2015) Are climate models credible worlds? Prospects and limitations of possibilistic climate prediction, European Journal for Philosophy of Science (forthcoming), DOI:10.1007/s13194-015-0108-y, http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13194-015-0108-y
• Böttcher M., Gabriel, J.,  Harnisch, S. (2015): Scenarios on Stratospheric Albedo Modification Deployment in 2030, SPP 1689 WORKSHOP REPORT, HAMBURG // 2015 // 22. – 24. MARCH, https://www.spp-climate-engineering.de/news.html
• Bonsch, M., Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., Bodirsky, ^,B., Dietrich,^, J.P., Rolinski,^, S. Biewald,^, A., Lotze-Campen, H., Weindl,^, I., Gerten, D. and Stevanovic, M. (2015): Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production, Global Change Biology Bioenergy (early online). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.12226/full
• Bürger, G., Cubasch, U. (2015): The detectability of climate engineering. In J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., pp. n/a-n/a. DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023954
  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JD023954/full
  
• Droste-Franke, B., Carrier, M., Kaiser, M., Schreurs, M., Weber, C., Ziesemer, T. (2015): Improving Energy Decisions. Advice for a Safe and Secure Future Energy System, Heidelberg: Springer, 2015, Chapters 2 & 3.
• Decker, Mahshid Sotoudeh (Eds.): Responsible Innovation. Neue Impulse für die Technikfolgenabschätzung? 1st ed. Baden-Baden: edition sigma, pp. 205–212. https://www.itas.kit.edu/2016_006.php
  
• Ferrer-Gonzalez, M.; Ilyina, T. (2015): Mitigation Potential, Risks, and Side-Effects of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement, Nova Acta Leopoldina 121 (408), pp. 275–278, http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:2129458:4/component/escidoc:2129457/NAL_Bd121_Nr408_275.pdf
• Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., Stevanovic, M., Müller, C., Bodirsky, B., Bonsch, M., Dietrich, J., Lotze-Campen, H., Weindl, I., Biewald A., Rolinski, S. (2015): Land-Use and Carbon Cycle Responses to Moderate Climate Change: Implications for Land-Based Mitigation? Environmental Science and Technology. 49 (11), 6731–6739, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es506201r
• Ilyina, T. (2015): The combined effects of changes in ocean chemistry, biology, and hydrodynamics on alkalinity, Nova Acta Leopoldina NF, 121 (No. 408 - Deglacial Changes in Ocean Dynamics and Atmospheric CO2), 107-110, http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:2129458:4/component/escidoc:2129457/NAL_Bd121_Nr408_275.pdf
• Kreuter, Judith (2015): Technofix, Plan B or Ultima Ratio? A Review of the Social Science Literature on Climate Engineering Technologies, University of Oxford INSIS Occasional Papers Series. http://www.insis.ox.ac.uk/occasional-papers/technofix-plan-b-or-ultima-ratio/
• Kreuter, Judith (2015): Discussion of Climate Engineering in Social Science Literature: Technofix, Plan B or Ultima Ratio, The Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment Blog. http://dcgeoconsortium.org/2015/07/20/discussion-of-climate-engineering-in-social-science-literature-technofix-plan-b-or-ultima-ratio-judith-kreuter/
• Kreuter, Judith/ Markus Lederer (2015): Climate Engineering - A Technofix to Solve the Problem of Climate Change?, KIB Global. http://www.kib.be/articles/1103/climate-engineering-a-technofix-to-solve-the-problem-of-climate-change
• Lenhard, J. (2015): Iteration unleashed. Computer technology in science, in: S. Ove Hansson (Eds.): The Role of Technology in Science. Philosophical Perspectives, New York: Springer, 113-130.
• Matzner, N. (2015): Engineering the Climate. Politik und Planung der Klimaintervention, in: Koch, M., Köhler, C., Othmer, J., Weich, A. (Eds.): Planlos! Zu den Grenzen von Planbarkeit. 1st ed. Paderborn: Fink, Wilhelm, pp. 165–179, http://www.researchgate.net/publication/279177005_Matzner_Nils_(2015)_Engineering_the_Climate._Politik_und_Planung.
• Mengis, N., Keller D., Eby, M. and Oschlies, A. (2015): Uncertainty in the response of transpiration to CO2 and implications for climate change, Environ. Res. Lett. 10 (2015) 094001, DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094001, http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094001/meta;jsessionid=266A63FE6C0A3A7E9A133B7375D03182.c1
• Niemeier, U., Timmreck, C. (2015): What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO2? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15 (16), pp. 9129–9141. DOI 10.5194/acp-15-9129-2015, http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/9129/2015/acp-15-9129-2015.html
• Quaas J. (2015): Approaches to Observe Anthropogenic Aerosol-Cloud Interactions. In Curr Clim Change Rep 1 (4), pp. 297–304. DOI: 10.1007/s40641-015-0028-0 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40641-015-0028-0/fulltext.html
• Saxler, B., Siegfried, J., Proelß, A. (2015): International liability for transboundary damage arising from stratospheric aerosol injections, Law, Innovation and Technology 7 (1), pp. 112–147. DOI 10.1080/17579961.2015.1052645, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17579961.2015.1052645
• Scott, V., Haszeldine, R. S., Tett, S. F. B., Oschlies, A. (2015): Fossil fuels in a trillion tonne world, Nature Climate Change 5, 419-423 (2015), doi:10.1038/nclimate2578
  http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n5/full/nclimate2578.html
• Schmidt, H., & Wolfrum, R. (2015): Gezielte Eingriffe: Climate Engineering aus klimawissenschaftlicher und völkerrechtlicher Perspektive, in: Marotzke, J. and Stratmann, M. (Eds.): Die Zukunft des Klimas, CH Beck, pp. 183-197,
  http://www.chbeck.de/Stratmann-Marotzke-Zukunft-Klimas/productview.aspx?product=13732095
• Sillmann, J., Lenton, T. M., Levermann, A., Ott, K., Hulme, M., Benduhn, F., Horton, J. B. (2015): Climate emergencies do not justify engineering the climate, Nature Climate Change 5 (4), pp. 290–292. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2539, http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n4/full/nclimate2539.html

2014

• Humpenöder F., Popp A., Dietrich J., Klein D, Lotze-Campen H., Bonsch M., Bodirsky B., Weindl I., Stevanovic M., Müller C. (2014): Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies, Environmental Research Letters 9 (6): 064029. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064029, http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064029/meta
• Keller, D. P., Feng, E. Y., Oschlies, A. (2014): Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high CO2-emissions scenario, Nat. Commun. 5: 3304, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4304
• Klepper, G., Rickels, W. (2014): Climate Engineering—Economic Considerations and Research Challenges, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8(2): 270-289, http://reep.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/2/270.abstract
• Matzner, N., Schmidt, L.-M. (2014): Das Projekt "Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung" und die Perspektiven disziplinärer, inter- und transdisziplinärer Kooperation, in: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 15 (3), Art. 9. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs140390
• Moosdorf, N., Renforth, P., Hartmann, J. (2014): Carbon Dioxide Efficiency of Terrestrial Enhanced Weathering, Environ. Sci. Technol: 48, 4809−4816, http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es4052022
• Popp, A., Humpenöder F., Weindl I., Bodirsky B. L., Bonsch M., Lotze-Campen H., Müller C., Biewald A., Rolinski S., Stevanovic M. and Dietrich J. P. (2014): Land-use protection for climate change mitigation, Nature Clim. Change 4 1095–8 DOI:10.1038/nclimate2444
  http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n12/full/nclimate2444.html
• Schrickel, I. (2014). Images of Feasibility: On the Viscourse of Climate Engineering. in B. Schneider, & T. Nocke (Hrsg.), Image Politics of Climate Change: Visualizations, Imaginations, Documentations. (S. 363-382). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag für Kommunikation, Kultur und soziale Praxis. http://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-2610-0/image-politics-of-climate-change

2013

• Ilyina, T., Wolf-Gladrow, D., Munhoven, G., Heinze, C. (2013): Assessing the potential of calcium-based artificial ocean alkalinization to mitigate rising atmospheric CO2 and ocean acidification,
  DOI: 10.1002/2013GL057981
  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013GL057981/abstract

Climate Engineering: Forschungsfragen einer gesellschaftlichen Herausforderung // 2012

Gemeinsame Stellungnahme für den Senat der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (nur Deutsch)

Scoping Report Climate Engineering // 2011

• Large-Scale Intentional Interventions into the Climate System? Assessing the Climate Engineering Debate
  Editors: Wilfried Rickels, Gernot Klepper and Jonas Dovern, (2011)