LEAC-II

Climate engineering (CE) has been proposed as a means of last resort to combat dangerous global change. However, numerous concerns arise when considering a possible implementation, or even a large field experiment. Yet, CE is not an either-or decision, and the transition from a field experiment to the application of CE is blurred. A realistic assessment of the potential future implementation of CE measures needs to seriously consider the possibility of limited-area CE. The modification of clouds exerts a radiative forcing that is localised to the region of spraying. This is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for a localised response of climate parameters such as near-surface temperature. A first question is, what could be the incentives and possibilities for countries or clubs of countries to utilise limited-area CE. To this end, we will estimate how strongly the economic preferences with respect to climate-related variables are correlated in space. Depending on the feasibility of a local manipulation of relevant climate variables, and given the preferences of the regions of the world with respect to these variables, a next question is to what extent countries or clubs of countries might make use of limited-area CE, and to what extent this would influence greenhouse gas mitigation efforts, in the absence of global cooperation on climate policy. The scope for regulation of limited-are CE depends on the possibility to attribute intended outcomes to CE measures and to exclude damages outside the targeted area. We will study this building on the experience with detection and attribution studies, making use of novel approaches exploiting ensemble climate forecasts at short timescales. In LEAC-II we finally aim at exploring the potential to draft an international regulation mechanism based on the theory of non-point source pollution control that would lead to a Pareto-improvement compared to the uncoordinated outcome.