Brochure SPP 1689
Climate engineering and our climate targets – a long-overdue debate
This publication was produced in 2019 as part of the public outreach work under the DFG Priority Programme, with only minor changes made for the English-language edition compared with the German edition. Its aim is to promote open social and political debate that is informed by the best available knowledge about the possibilities and risks of the various climate engineering ideas.
Unsere Klimaziele – die Rolle negativer Emissionen: SPP 1689 beim Tag der offenen Tür des GEOMARs
Sonntag, 18. August 2019, 11 - 17 Uhr.
GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Wischhofstr. 1-3, 24148 Kiel.
New Publication
- Rickels, W., C, Merk, F. Reith, D. Keller and A. Oschlies (2019). (Mis)conceptions about modelling of negative emissions technologies. Environ. Res. Lett., https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3ab4
- Stenzel, F., D. Gerten, C. Werner and J. Jägermeyr (2019) Freshwater requirements of large-scale bioenergy plantations for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, Environmental Research Letters 14, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2b4b
Unsere Klimaziele – die Rolle negativer Emissionen: Trickfilm auf der Kieler Woche 2019
Zu sehen auf der Kieler Woche im Zelt auf der "Schlaumachwiese" vor dem GEOMAR.
Podiumsdiskussion im Museum für Naturkunde
MITTWOCH 15. MAI 2019 // 19:30 – 22:30
MUSEUM FÜR NATURKUNDE BERLIN
WIRD CLIMATE ENGINEERING SALONFÄHIG?
Das Schwerpunktprogramm der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
zu Climate Engineering und das Museum für Naturkunde luden zur
öffentlichen Podiumsdiskussion ein.
SPP 1689 Workshop
Climate Engineering: Opportunities and Challenges for Responsible Research and Anticipatory Governance
May 14-16, 2019 in Berlin
New Publications
- Boyd, P., C. Vivian, M. Boettcher, F. Chai, J. Cullen, T. Goeschl, R. Lampitt, A. Lenton, A. Oschlies, G. Rau, R. Rickaby, K. Ricke an R. Wanninkhof (2019). High Level Review of a Wide Range of Proposed Marine Geoengineering Techniques, Journal Series GESAMP Reports and Studies 98, http://www.gesamp.org/publications/high-level-review-of-a-wide-range-of-proposed-marine-geoengineering-techniques
- Irvine, P., K. Emanuel, J. He, L. W. Horowitz, G. Vecchi and D. Keith (2019). Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards, Nature Climate Changevolume 9, 295–299, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0398-8
- Mengis, N., D. P. Keller, W. Rickels, M. Quaas and A. Oschlies (2019). Climate engineering–induced changes in correlations between Earth system variables—implications for appropriate indicator selection, Climate Change, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-019-02389-7
- Pfrommer, T., Goeschl, T., Proelss, A. et al. Climatic Change (2019). Establishing causation in climate litigation: admissibility and reliability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4
- Reith, F., W. Koeve, D. P. Keller, J. Getzlaff and A. Oschlies (2019). Meeting climate targets by direct CO2 injections: What price would the ocean have to pay? Earth System Dynamics, https://www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/esd-2018-87/
- Robrecht, S., B. Vogel, J.-U. Grooß, K. Rosenlof, T. Thornberry, A. Rollins, M. Krämer, L. Christensen and R. Müller (2019) Mechanism of ozone loss under enhanced water vapour conditions in the mid-latitude lower stratosphere in Summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5805-5833, https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/5805/2019/
Öffentlicher Vortrag in der GEOMAR-Reihe »Wissen Schaffen«: Wie wir das 1.5 Grad Ziel noch erreichen könnten
Prof. Dr. Andreas Oschlies // Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2019
Sehen und hören Sie den Vortag auf youtube: https://youtu.be/APnDQsenbdI
Klar Soweit? No.59 – Dr. Greenhouse
Comic der Helmholtz Gemeinschaft zum Thema Climate Engineering:
https://blogs.helmholtz.de/augenspiegel/2018/12/klar-soweit-no-59/
Workshop Detection and Attribution of Climate Engineering
3 – 5 December 2018, Hamburg, Elsa-Brandström-Haus (www.ebh-hamburg.de)
Debatte zu Geoengineering vom 28. November ab 18 Uhr im Spreepalais in Berlin: https://www.die-debatte.org/geoengineering/ (deutsch)
Auf dem Podium zu Gast waren die Geographin Lili Fuhr von der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, der Ökonom Prof. Jan Christoph Minx, PhD vom Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change und der Physiker Prof. Dr. Andreas Oschlies vom Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung in Kiel und Sprecher des SPP 1689. Christoph Koch (Stern) und Dr. Mai Thi Nguyen-Kim (freie Wissenschaftsjournalistin) moderierten die Veranstaltung.
Online
Die Debatte zu Geoengineering mit Texten, Videos und Grafiken: https://twitter.com/die_debatte
https://www.die-debatte.org
Zusammenfassung der Livedebatte auf youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmqKW5Uim7I
Wissenschaft, natürlich!
Zum Thema: Climate Engineering – mit gezielten technischen Eingriffen das Klima verändern. Hilft uns das weiter?
Diskussionsveranstaltung
Prof. Dr. Andreas Oschlies vom GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel und Prof. Dr. Alexander Proelß, Rechtswissenschaftler der Universität Hamburg diskutieren mit dem Publikum.
Eine Veranstaltung des Naturkundemuseums Berlin in Zusammenarbeit mit dem SPP 1689 im Rahmenprogramm zur Sonderausstellung ARTEFAKTE im Naturkundemuseum.
Weitere Informationen und Anmeldung:
https://www.museumfuernaturkunde.berlin/de/museum/veranstaltungen/wissenschaft-natuerlich
„Klimaforschung und Handlungsoptionen im globalen Wandel – Hintergründe, Möglichkeiten und Ideen für den naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht“
Eine Kooperation des SPP 1689 mit dem Pädagogischen Landesinstitut Rheinland-Pfalz:
Lehrerfortbildung am 26.10.2018 in Trier mit einem aktivierenden Vortag von Ulrike Bernitt und dem Climate engineering Rollenspiel „Globaler Krisenstab zum Klimawandel“.
Mehr zum Rollenspiel für Schüler finden Sie hier ...
Mehr zum Thema Climate Engineering als Thema im Schulunterricht hier …
»Date an Expert« im Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin
Treffen Sie Fabian Stenzel aus unserem Projekt CE-LAND+ und weitere Experten am Mittwoch, den 17.10. im Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin:
Mehr zu Date an Expert am 17.10. ...
Eine Veranstaltung im Rahmen der sehenswerten Ausstellung ARTEFAKTE über drängende Umeltthemen.
Our animation film is now available on youtube: Ambitious climate targets – the role of negative emissions
3rd SPP 1689 Retreat / September 2018
3rd & last annual retreat of the SPP1689/2
26. - 28. September Schloss Buchenau
SPP 1689 on youtube
Find our films on youtube at the SPP1689 channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_jrnTE19gsL2N1xCmhL_Jg
New SPP 1689 Publications
-
Beck, Silke; et al. (2018): The politics of anticipation. The IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience, https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2018.7 -
Beck, Silke, M. Mahony (2018): The IPCC and the new map of science and politics, WIREs Clim Change, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.547 - Held, Hermann (2018): Der ökonomische Wert von Klimainformation: Zur Neuinterpretation von Klimazielen unter antizipiertem Lernen, Unsicherheit als Herausforderung für die Wissenschaft, https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631761533/chapter-003.xhtml#_idParaDest-5
- Janich, Nina and C. Stumpf (2018): Verantwortung unter der Bedingung von Unsicherheit - und was KlimawissenschaftlerInnen darunter verstehen, Unsicherheit als Herausforderung für die Wissenschaft, https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631761533/chapter-009.xhtml#_idParaDest-13
- Lawrence, Mark G., S. Schäfer, H. Muri, V. Scott, A. Oschlies, N. E. Vaughan, O. Bucher, H. Schmidt, J. Haywood and J. Scheffran (2018): Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals, Nature Communications 9 (3734), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3
- Matzner, Nils and D. Barben (2018): Verantwortungsvoll das Klima manipulieren? Unsicherheit und Verantwortung im Diskurs um Climate Engineering, Unsicherheit als Herausforderung für die Wissenschaft, https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631761533/chapter-008.xhtml#_idParaDest-12
- Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G. and Rehdanz, K. (2018) Do climate engineering experts display moral-hazard behaviour?, Climate Policy, doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1494534
-
Neuber, Frederike (2017): Buying Time with Climate Engineering? An analysis of the buying time framing in favor of climate engineering, https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000084294 - Oschlies, Andreas (2018): Bewertung von Modellqualität und Unsicherheiten in der Klimamodellierung, Unsicherheit als Herausforderung für die Wissenschaft, https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631761533/chapter-002.xhtml#_idTextAnchor040
- Pfrommer, T. (2018): Diverging Regional Climate Preferences and the Assessment of Solar Geoengineering, Discussion Paper Series (654), doi:10.11588/heidok.00025204
- Rickels, W., M. Quaas, K. Ricke, J. Quaas, J. Moreno-Cruz, S. Smulders (2018): Turning the Global Thermostat — Who, When, and How Much?, Kiel Working Paper (2110), https://www.ifw-kiel.de/de/experten/ifw-researcher-internal/wilfried-rickels/turning-the-global-thermostat-who-when-and-how-much/
Video Impression from the SPP 1689 & ISOS Workshop on Science Communication
A video by Zhihong Zho // July 2018 // Travemünde
Updated versions of our information graphics on Climate Engineering ideas
The infographics are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Contrails vs Chemtrails
Young Scientist Retreat & Workshop 2018
The SPP 1689 Young Scientist Retreat & Workshop on Interdisciplinary Exchange took place in the Landhaus Lenzener Elbtalaue, April 23-25.
New HYPERAUM.TV-Shows (german)
Report: http://hyperraum.tv/2018/04/01/frei-schwebend/
Talk with Prof. Andreas Oschlies (DFG-Politik) http://hyperraum.tv/2018/04/06/in-schieflage/
Talk with Prof. Andreas Oschlies (Mesokosmos) http://hyperraum.tv/2018/04/06/waerme-upload-oder-co2-download/
Talk with Prof. Thomas Leisner http://hyperraum.tv/2018/04/01/die-wolke-im-labor/
Teaser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1SpfQ2-FrY
Video-Blog at SciLogs https://scilogs.spektrum.de/hyperraumtv/von-wolkenmachern-zu-wolkenjaegern/
SPP 1689 citizen's jury
The DFG project TOMACE, one of the projects within the SPP 1689 »Climate Engineering«, started in January his citizen's jury. Participation was only possible by invitation.
New SPP 1689 Publications
- Ferrer González, Miriam, Tatiana Ilyina, Sebastian Sonntag, Hauke Schmidt (2018): Enhanced Rates of Regional Warming and Ocean Acidification after Termination of Large‐scale Ocean Alkalinization, Geophysical Research Letters, doi: 10.1029/2018gl077847
- Keller, D.P., Lenton, A., Littleton, E.W. et al. (2018): The Effects of Carbon Dioxide Removal on the Carbon Cycle, Curr Clim Change Rep, 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0104-3
- , M., , , , , , , , .
- Oliveira-Garcia, W., T. Amann, J. Hartmann (2018): Increasing biomass demand enlarges negative forest nutrient budget areas in wood export regions, Scientific Reports 8 (5280), doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22728-5
- Ott, K. K. (2018): On the Political Economy of Solar Radiation Management, Frontiers in Environmental Science 6, 43, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00043
- Rickels, W., Reith, F., Keller, D., Oschlies, A., & Quaas, M. F. (2018): Integrated Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Removal, Earth’s Future, 6. doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000724
- Roshan, E., M. M. Khabbazan & H. Held (2018): Cost-Risk Trade-Off of Mitigation and Solar Geoengineering: Considering Regional Disparities Under Probabilistic Climate Sensitivity, Environ. Resource Econ., 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0261-9
- Werner, C., H-P. Schmidt, D. Gerten, W. Lucht and C. Kammann (2018): Biogeochemical potential of biomass pyrolysis systems for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, Environmental Research Letters 13 (4), http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e
CDRMIP has been endorsed by CMIP6
The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP; currently in it's 6th phase) is organized under the auspices of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) and designed to better understand past, present, and future climate change through coordinated international multi-model experiments that have become a central element of national and international assessments of climate change, e.g., IPCC reports. The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP), which has just been endorsed by CMIP6, brings together models of the Earth system in a common framework to explore the potential, impacts, and challenges of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR). CDRMIP experiments are designed to address questions concerning CDR-induced climate "reversibility", the response of the Earth system to direct atmospheric CO2 removal (direct air capture and storage), and the CDR potential of proposed schemes such as afforestation/reforestation and ocean alkalinization.
World Climate Research Program: https://www.wcrp-climate.org/modelling-wgcm-mip-catalogue/cmip6-endorsed-mips-article/1302-modelling-cmip6-cdrrmip
CDRMIP: http://www.kiel-earth-institute.de/CDR_Model_Intercomparison_Project.html
New SPP 1689 Publications
- Keller, D. P., Lenton, A., Scott, V., Vaughan, N. E., Bauer, N., Ji, D., Jones, C. D., Kravitz, B., Muri, H., and Zickfeld, K.: The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDR-MIP): Rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-168, 2018
- Kleinschmitt, C., Boucher, O., and Platt, U. (2018): Sensitivity of the radiative forcing by stratospheric sulfur geoengineering to the amount and strategy of the SO2injection studied with the LMDZ-S3A model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2769-2786, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2769-2018
- Oschlies, Andreas (2018): Solar engineering must take temperature debt into account, Nature 554, 423, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02203-x
- Mengis, N., Keller, D. P., and Oschlies, A. (2018): Systematic Correlation Matrix Evaluation (SCoMaE) – a bottom–up, science-led approach to identifying indicators, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 15-31, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-15-2018
- Keller D.P. (2018) Marine Climate Engineering. In: Salomon M., Markus T. (eds) Handbook on Marine Environment Protection. Springer, Cham, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60156-4_13
- Strefler, Jessica; et al. (2018): Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4 - Sonntag, Sebastian; et al. (2018): Quantifying and comparing effects of climate engineering methods on the Earth system, Earth's Future, doi
- Heck, Vera; et al. (2018): Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries, Nature Climate Change (2018), doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y
SPP 1689 Workshop Terrestrial CO2 Removal
SPP 1689 WORKSHOP // 22 – 23 Jan 2018 // Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, A56
Terrestrial CO2 Removal: Potentials and tradeoffs in the SDG context
This workshop will look into a set of pertinent questions related to potentials of tCDR methods and their interaction with SDGs. It will bring together SPP 1689 researchers and external experts to increase our holistic understanding of global and regional potentials and side-effects of tCDR as well as to identify future research priorities.
read more and find the agenda here ...
New Publications
Niemeier, U. and Schmidt, H. (2017): Changing transport processes in the stratosphere by radiative heating of sulfate aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14871-14886, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14871-2017
Feng, E. Y.; Koeve, W.; Keller, D. P. and Oschlies, A. (2017): Model-based Assessment of the CO2 Sequestration Potential of Coastal Ocean Alkalinization. In Earth's Future. DOI: 10.1002/2017EF000659. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017EF000659/pdf
New Publication
Ferrer-Gonzalez, M. (2017). Climate engineering by enhancement of ocean alkalinity: impacts on the Earth system and a comparison with solar radiation management. PhD Thesis, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg. doi:10.17617/2.2472753. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-CEB7-1
German Science Hour im Deutschen Pavillion auf der COP 23
https://www.fona.de/de/german-science-hour-22654.html
https://twitter.com/hashtag/GermanScienceHour?src=hash&lang=de
Andreas Oschlies, Mark Lawrence, Oliver Geden and Lilly Fuhr: “Failing the carbon budget - what's next?” (Photo)
SPP 1689 Workshop Climate Engineering Regulation and Liability
16 – 18 October 2017, KIEL
Some photographs, more information and the agenda here (english only) ...
New SPP 1689 Publications
- Tavoni, M., V. Bosetti, S. Shayegh, L. Drouet, J. Emmerling, S. Fuss, T. Goeschl, C. Guivarch, T. S. Lontzek, V. Manoussi, J. Moreno-Cruz, H. Muri, M. Quaas, W. Rickels, (2017), 'Challenges and Opportunities for Integrated Modeling of Climate Engineering', Nota di Lavoro 38.2017, Milan, Italy: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. http://www.feem.it/en/publications/feem-working-papers-note-di-lavoro-series/challenges-and-opportunities-for-integrated-modeling-of-climate-engineering/
- Kemena,Tronje Peer; Matthes, Katja; Martin, Thomas; Wahl, Sebastian; Oschlies, Andreas: Atmospheric feedbacks in North Africa from an irrigated, afforested Sahara, Clim Dyn (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3890-8
- Keller, D. P., Lenton, A., Scott, V., Vaughan, N. E., Bauer, N., Ji, D., Jones, C. D., Kravitz, B., Muri, H., and Zickfeld, K.: The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDR-MIP): Rationale and experimental design, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-168, in review, 2017.
Overview on modelling in the SPP 1689
plus.faz.net
Klimaschutz braucht mehr Forscher und Erfinder
// Weniger Emissionen allein reichen nicht: Der Atmosphäre muss CO2 entzogen werden / Von Andreas Mihm
Wilfried Rickels u.a. im Artikel auf plus.faz.net (german):
http://plus.faz.net/wirtschaft/2017-08-15/b7d10e4889e5578561092afc696526cd/
New SPP 1689 Publications
-
Niemeier, Ulrike, Tilmes, Simone: Sulfur injections for a cooler planet, Science 21 Jul 2017, Vol. 357, Issue 6348, pp. 246-248, DOI: 10.1126/science.aan3317, http://science.sciencemag.org/content/357/6348/246
- Lohmann, Ulrike, Gasparini, Blaž: A cirrus cloud climate dial?, Science 21 Jul 2017, Vol. 357, Issue 6348, pp. 248-249, DOI: 10.1126/science.aan3325, http://science.sciencemag.org/content/357/6348/248
- Stelzer, Harald (2017): Justifying Climate Engineering?. In: Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik. Band 21 (2016). Berlin: De Gruyter, 147–169.
SPP 1689 on youtube
Find our films on youtube at the SPP1689 channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_jrnTE19gsL2N1xCmhL_Jg
New SPP 1689 Publications
- Braun, Carola; Merk, Christine; Pönitzsch, Gert; Rehdanz, Katrin; Schmidt, Ulrich (2017): Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany. Survey evidence. In: Climate Policy 5 (1), S. 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1304888 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14693062.2017.1304888?tokenDomain=eprints&tokenAccess=vqDyV6Wab5KBByafy5fX&forwardService=showFullText&doi=10.1080%2F14693062.2017.1304888&doi=10.1080%2F14693062.2017.1304888&journalCode=tcpo2
Radio Ecoshock
Lena Boysen about »green« climate engineering with trees:
http://www.ecoshock.org/2017/05/trees-we-love-but-cannot-save.html
New SPP 1689 Publications
-
Boysen, Lena R.; et al. (2017): The limits to global-warming mitigation by terrestrial carbon removal. In: Earth's Future. DOI: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000469/full
-
Muraca, Barbara; Neuber, Frederike (2017): Viable and convivial technologies: Considerations on Climate Engineering from a degrowth perspective. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.159 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617308983
- Beck, Silke; Mahony, Martin (2017): The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. In: Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, p. 311-333, DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3264 http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v7/n5/full/nclimate3264.html?WT.ec_id=NCLIMATE-201705&spMailingID=53950284&spUserID=ODkwMTM2NjQyMAS2&spJobID=1144733188&spReportId=MTE0NDczMzE4OAS2
First Young Scientist Retreat of the 2nd Phase
SPP 1689 Young Scientist Retreat in Malente
New SPP 1689 Publications
- Boysen, Lena; et. al (2017): Trade-offs for food production, nature conservation and climate limit the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential. In: Global Change Biology, Accepted Articles, DOI:
- Boysen, Lena; et. al (2016): Impacts devalue the potential of large-scale terrestrial CO2 removal through biomass plantations. In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 11, Letter 9, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095010 http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095010/meta;jsessionid=325AACE0FC1BCA551F5ABFF7BC15679E.ip-10-40-2-108
- Montserrat, Francesc; et al. (2017): Olivine Dissolution in Seawater: Implications for CO2 Sequestration through Enhanced Weathering in Coastal Environments. In: Environmental Science & Technology, 51, 3960-3970. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05942 http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.6b05942
Veröffentlichung der Deutschen Meteorologischen Gesellschaft
Die Deutsche Meteorologischen Gesellschaft (DMG) hat eine Stellungnahme und einen kurzen Erläuterungstext zu Climate Engineering in ihren »Mitteilungen« veröffentlicht:
DFG Klimataucher: Überzeugungssache Klima
Beitrag mit Video angeregt vom SPP 1689 Projekt C-E-THICS.
DFG Klimataucher: Klimaeingriffe mit Recht und Ordnung
DFG Klimataucher: Der Traum von der Steuerung des Klimas
Beitrag mit Video angeregt vom SPP 1689 Projekt ComparCE.
New SPP 1689 Publications
- Quaas, Martin F.; Quaas, Johannes; Rickels, Wilfried; Boucher, Olivier (2017): Are there reasons against open-ended research into solar radiation management? A model of intergenerational decision-making under uncertainty. In Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.02.002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069617300608
New SPP 1689 Publications
- Oschlies, A.; Klepper, G. (2016): Research for assessment, not deployment of Climate Engineering: The German Research Foundation's Priority Program SPP 1689. In Earth´s Future. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000446/abstract
- Oschlies, A.; Held, H.; Keller, D.; Keller, K.; Mengis, N.; Quaas, M. et al. (2016): Indicators and Metrics for the Assessment of Climate Engineering. In Earth's Future. DOI 10.1002/2016EF000449 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000449/full
- Quaas, J.; Quaas, M. F.; Boucher, O. & Rickels, W. (2016): Regional climate engineering by radiation management: Prerequisites and prospects. In: Earth's future, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000440/full
- Baatz, Christian; Ott, Konrad (2016): Why Aggressive Mitigation Must Be Part of Any Pathway to Climate Justice. In: Christopher J. Preston (Ed.): Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Rowman & Littlefield International. http://www.rowmaninternational.com/books/climate-justice-and-geoengineering
- Boysen, Lena; et. al (2016): Impacts devalue the potential of large-scale terrestrial CO2 removal through biomass plantations. In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 11, Letter 9, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095010 http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095010/meta;jsessionid=325AACE0FC1BCA551F5ABFF7BC15679E.ip-10-40-2-108
SPP 1689 Workshop on the 1.5°C Target and Climate Engineering
24–25 November 2016 // Kiel // Germany
Infographic
More downloads for your information under DOWNLOADS
This infographic is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Infographic
Is Climate Engineering an option to prevent climate change?
There are many central open questions. More downloads for your information under DOWNLOADS
This infographic is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Faltblatt Naturwissenschaftler antworten Journalisten
Einige Naturwissenschaftler aus dem Schwerpunktprogramm SPP 1689 antworten hier professionellen WissenschaftsjournalistInnen vom „Nationalen Institut für Wissenschaftskommunikation“ (Karlsruhe) auf konkrete Fragen zu ihrer Wissenschaft.
Hier klicken um zum e-paper »Naturwissenschaftler antworten Journalisten« zu kommen
New SPP 1689 Publications
- Kreidenweis, Ulrich; Humpenöder, Florian; Stevanović, Miodrag; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon; Kriegler, Elmar; Lotze-Campen, Hermann; Popp, Alexander (2016): Afforestation to mitigate climate change. Impacts on food prices under consideration of albedo effects. In Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (8), p. 85001–85001. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/085001
- Gasparini, Blaž; Lohmann, Ulrike (2016): Why cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially cool the planet. In J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121 (9), pp. 4877–4893. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JD024666/abstract
- Heck, Vera; Donges, Jonathan F.; Lucht, Wolfgang (2016): Collateral transgression of planetary boundaries due to climate engineering by terrestrial carbon dioxide removal. In Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., pp. 1–24. http://www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/esd-2016-22/
KlimaTaucher - Fernreisen mit gutem Gewissen? Wie wir das Klima beeinflussen können
DFG-Filmproduktion zu Climate Engineering mit Andreas Oschlies und Nadine Mengis
http://www.dfg.de/webapps/klimataucher/#/de/vier_fragen_zum_klima/klimamanipulation_klimasteuerung
New SPP 1689 Publications
Ellias Y Feng (冯玉铭), David P Keller, Wolfgang Koeve and Andreas Oschlies (2016): Could artificial ocean alkalinization protect tropical coral ecosystems from ocean acidification? In: Environmental Research Letters, vol. 11, no. 7, http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074008/meta
First SPP 1689 Retreat of the 2nd Phase
14-16 June 2016, Kloster Haydau / Morschen
(project presentations, discussion of action items for the 2nd phase, setting of cross-project topics)
New SPP 1689 Publications
Mengis, Nadine; et al. (2016): Assessing climate impacts and risks of ocean albedo modification in the Arctic. In Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, vol. 121, 3 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/2015JC011433/abstract
Merk, Christine; Pönitzsch, Gert; Rehdanz, Katrin (2016): Knowledge about aerosol injection does not reduce individual mitigration efforts. In: Environmental Research Letters, vol. 11, no. 5 http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054009/meta